Anonymous No.566896231 Replies: >>566896281 >>566896349 >>566896449 >>566896827 >>566897839 >>566904990 >>566928967
File: Butters-southpark1.jpg (93 KB, 900x600)
Butters-southpark1.jpg
I'm trying to decide whether to buy a Big Screen Beyond 2, or Viture Beast glasses, or to just wait for the technology to improve.
My biggest use case is to lay in bed and watch 3d movies, or lay in bed and play standard 2d games with keyboard and mouse, upscaled to 3d the way nvidia 3d vision used to do.
I had a 3D projector and it automatically converted normal 3d games. When I loaded up Starcraft 2 it honest to god looked like there was a 10 foot wide hole in my bedroom wall and I was looking out over a battlefield. Diablo 3 also felt like I was actually looking out over a 3D space. I guess the term I'm looking for is automatically converted stereoscopic 3D.
My second use case is I want to pirate a copy of Beat Saber and play modded in tracks/levels. I have a library of music that will never get added as a DLC but if tools exist to create levels out of my music library I then I really want to do that.
I also want to try Satisfactory in Virtual Reality. And if it doesn't feel good then to at least play it in stereoscopic 3D like my regular library of games. I might want to try racing games with a wheel mounted to my desk and pedals.
I could be traveling a lot in the future and will want to take my headset with me. I know with the Big Screen Beyond I would have to take the base stations with me, I don't know how much of a pain in the ass it would be to set up in a hotel room.
So I'm asking you guys whether the Big Screen Beyond has good enough image quality that you wouldn't mind watching movies and tv with it. Right now I lay in bed with my laptop on my chest all the time and a vr headset or display glasses would probably feel like a huge upgrade. I know the Beast is overall about a thousand dollars cheaper but I'm not worried about the cost.